![]() |
|
Top > CSR Framework > Environmental Accounting
Environmental Accounting was introduced in FY2000 to periodically evaluate the activity results and environmental costs of business activities. The results were then applied in an effort to practice more effective and efficient environmental management. We will continue to use this as a tool for the public to gain further understanding of the environmental aspects of our business. In addition, Mie factory held a study meeting on material flow cost accounting* and discussed potential benefits of its introduction.
1. Aggregation Procedures and Guidelines
- The following Guidelines are employed as we emphasize reliability, comparability and verifiability; "Environmental Accounting Guideline FY2005" published by the Ministry of Environment, "2003 Environmental Conservation Cost Category Handbook" by the Ministry of Environment, "Environmental Accounting Guideline for Chemical Industries" by JCIA (Japan Chemical Industry Association) and JRCC (Japan Responsible Care Council).
- "Deemed Effect" and "Risk Avoidance" were not taken into consideration. However, we do plan to incorporate these items when the standardized guidelines are set in the future.
- Depreciation has been calculated by legal straight-line depreciation, even though the depreciation period tends to vary by facility. The economic effect includes the 5-year depreciation effect during the depreciation period.
2. Aggregation Scope and Period
We employ consolidated environmental accounting that aggregates accounting of Asahi Denka Co., Ltd. and domestic group companies, since FY2003.
3. Environmental Investments and Economic Effects
Among \9.06 billion gross investment in facilities for FY 2004, environmental investment was \1.39 billion, 15.3% of the total. The ratio increased greatly because of our proactive investment on countermeasures for global warming. Among the environmental conservation cost of \1.68 billion, the economic effect of the environmental conservation measures amounted to \600 million, 35.7% of the total cost.
Environmental investment increased by \760 million and environmental conservation cost decreased by \100 million over the previous FY. Profit generated by environmental investment increased \40 million.
4. Cost required for GHGs emission reduction
Cost required for 1t GHGs emission reduction was \38,000, \31,000 decrease over \69,000 of FY2003. GHGs emission was greatly reduced as a result of energy conservation efforts in FY2004.
5. Environmental Accounting Results
Environmental Protection Costiunit: 1 million yenj |
||||
Categories |
Purpose of Cost |
Investment |
Cost |
|
Cost in Business Area |
Environmental conservation cost to reduce environmental burden |
1,379 |
1,534 |
|
breakdown |
Pollution Control |
Maintenance and management of facilities to prevent air pollution, water and soil contamination, and noise pollution. Levy |
288 |
813 |
Global Environment |
Maintenance and management of facilities to control greenhouse gas emissions (energy conservation) and prevent ozone layer depletion. |
1,049 |
243 |
|
Resource Recycling |
Resource conservation, i.e. waste reduction and recycling promotion |
42 |
478 |
|
Up/downstream Environmental Burden Reduction |
Collect and recycle packages/containers and promote green procurement |
0 |
14 |
|
Environmental Management Activities |
Environmental education, ISO compliance, environmental impact analysis/measurement of business activities, and greenery and herbicide works of factories and offices. |
0 |
96 |
|
R&D |
R&D related to environmental protection (environmentally sound products and technologies) |
8 |
24 |
|
Social Activities |
Green procurement, herbicidal works, information disclosure, and association participation fees. |
0 |
3 |
|
Environmental Damage Compensations |
Restore soil contamination and other damage to nature |
0 |
9 |
|
Total |
1,387 |
1,680 |
||
Environmental Protection Effect |
|||||
Categories of Environmental Protection Effect |
Environmental Performance Index |
Unit |
FY2003 |
FY2004 |
Difference from the previous FY |
Resource Input |
Gross Energy Input (crude oil equivalent) |
(kl) |
71,839 |
73,301 |
1,462 |
Electric Power Purchased |
(kl) |
23,716 |
25,505 |
1,789 |
|
Steam/ Fuel Purchased |
(kl) |
48,123 |
47,796 |
327 |
|
Gross Water Input |
(1,000t) |
13,397 |
14,508 |
1,111 |
|
Industrial Water |
(1,000t) |
5,935 |
6,039 |
104 |
|
Water Supply, Purified Water, Groundwater and Other |
(1,000t) |
7,462 |
8,469 |
1,007 |
|
Waste and Environmental Burden Discharged |
Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) Emission |
(t) |
182,294 |
183,307 |
1,013 |
CO2 |
(t) |
182,185 |
183,198 |
1,013 |
|
Other GHGs |
(t) |
109 |
109 |
0 |
|
Chemical Substances Discharge/ Transportation |
(1,000t) |
453 |
418 |
35 |
|
Discharge to Air, Water, and Soil |
(t) |
10 |
9 |
1 |
|
Discharge as Waste |
(t) |
443 |
409 |
34 |
|
Amount of Industrial Waste Generated |
(t) |
34,340 |
38,043 |
3,703 |
|
Waste Disposal by Commissioned Subcontractor |
(t) |
13,442 |
15,575 |
2,133 |
|
Final Landfill Amount |
(t) |
1,281 |
782 |
499 |
|
Gross Water Discharge |
(1,000t) |
2,004 |
2,140 |
136 |
|
BOD |
(t) |
43 |
56 |
13 |
|
COD |
(t) |
56 |
52 |
4 |
|
Other Emission |
(t) |
148 |
63 |
85 |
|
NOx |
(t) |
54 |
51 |
3 |
|
SOx |
(t) |
94 |
12 |
82 |
|
Goods and Services Calculated |
CO2 Emission from Transportation |
(1,000t) |
5,022 |
5,144 |
122 |
Amount of Products Transported |
(kt) |
178 |
208 |
30 |
|
Transportation Efficiency and Other |
(t) |
4,890 |
6,803 |
1,913 |
|
6. Economic Effect of Environmental Protection, Environmental Investment, and Change of Environmental Protection Investment
Economic Effects Associated with the Environmental Protection Measures |
|
Contents of Effect |
Amount |
Income from Recycling |
32 |
Cost Reduction by Energy Conservation |
287 |
Waste Disposal Cost Reduction Associated with Recycling |
42 |
Reduction in Raw Materials Used |
190 |
Logistics Cost Reduction due to Better Transport Efficiency |
50 |
Total |
601 |


7. Future Direction
We seek to improve data accuracy of each factory through internal verification based on gEnvironmental Accounting Calculation Guidelineh. We are planning to introduce environmental accounting in factories overseas.
EnvironmentalF BACK | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | NEXT
HOME TOP | Copyright © 2006 ADEKA CORPORATION All Rights Reserved.

